

 <http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071072.htm> http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071072.htm

Tho only software "products" explicitely mentioned in this documents 
are ... WinBUGS, BRugs and OpenBugs. Not exactly a common component of 
your average "validated" toolchain... 



Thanks, Emmanuel, I knew of  the tenor  of that document, but had not located it before. To be fair, SAS R SPSS are not mentioned in that document because it refers to Bayesian only. And I am a bit reluctant using these: Taking into account that there are not too many alternatives, when checking for updates I am always surprised that nothing has changed the last year. JAGS should be added, probably, Martyn seems to advance it actively.

Greetings from Tübingen

Dieter

 

 

 


-- 
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-R-in-clinical-trials-tp1559402p1565708.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

