Hello all,
After almost half a year, I received a friendly e-mail from Peter Calhoun,
sharing his R implementation of Barnard's exact test. With his permission, I
posted his code here:
http://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/barnards-exact-test-a-powerful-alternative-for-fishers-exact-test-implemented-in-r/<http://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/barnards-exact-test-a-non-parametric-alternative-for-fishers-exact-test-implemented-in-r/>

I hope others will find it useful.
Please note that the code is not as fast as could be. If someone would wish
to give a faster version of the code, please let me know and I'll gladly
post it.


Cheers,
Tal



----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: Tal.Galili@gmail.com |  972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Tal Galili <tal.galili@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello R help members. I came across today with an article on Barnard's
> exact test (http://www.cytel.com/Papers/twobinomials.pdf), that is
> supposed to give a more powerful fisher.test - Because it doesn't assume
> that we know the row and column totals are in advance. Any pointers to such
> a function ? Thanks, Tal
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> My contact information:
> Tal Galili
> Phone number: 972-50-3373767
> FaceBook: Tal Galili
> My Blogs:
> http://www.r-statistics.com/
> http://www.talgalili.com
> http://www.biostatistics.co.il
>
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

