Hi,

Maybe I know the answer to my own question.
When I built R 2.9.0, I didn't say:

  ./configure --enable-R-shlib

I know I have given "--prefix" flag, but that's
the only flag I used.

I would appreciate it, if someone would give me
a definitive answer, however.

Regards,

Tena Sakai
tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu


-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces@r-project.org on behalf of Tena Sakai
Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 4:07 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] I don't see libR.so in my installation directory
 
Hi,

I installed R 2.9.0 a couple of days ago on a
linux machine.  At the root of installation,
I see 4 directories: bin, lib64, share, and src.

I don't see libR.so anywhere.  (In the following
context, . (dot) indicates the root of my insta-
llation.)  I do see:
./lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so
./lib64/R/lib/libRlapack.so

I became aware of such as I was preparing for
an installation of little r.  The installation
material stated to look for libR.so, and I want
to make sure that the one I installed (2.9.0)
is used by little r.

Would someone please clue me in?  Why don't I
have libR.so and yet when I execute ./bin/R
it says:
  R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)

Regards,

Tena Sakai
tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


