Graham: OK. Just give me a few days and I will be sending you some simple RVM code lines. However, you have the Kernlab help with some nice examples
 
Best regards
 
Dr. Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi
University of the Basque Country
SPAIN


--- El vie, 9/1/09, Graham Williams <Graham.Williams@togaware.com> escribió:

De: Graham Williams <Graham.Williams@togaware.com>
Asunto: Re: [R] a first opinion on rattle
Para: r-help@r-project.org
Fecha: viernes, 9 enero, 2009 12:40

Received Fri 09 Jan 2009  7:49pm +1100 from Gabriel Ibarra:
[...]

> I have installed rattle and is pretty intuitive and
> friendly. However, I miss some features of the original packages
> which cannot be invoked from rattle. For example, 'randomForest'
> package is??used but random??forests cannot be used in one of ??-in
> my opinion- most powerful aspects like regression. The same about
> SVM??. I would also say include RVM which the scientific literature
> suggest is mugh powerful than SVM.

> Anyway,??I must congratulate you and your team for providing the
> scientific community with rattle.

Thanks for the most kind feedback Gabriel. It is appreciated.

I am always open to suggestions. I should turn the randomForest
regression option on. Thanks for suggesting that. 

RVM from kernlab is in the todo list now. Do you have some simple
examples using rvm for regression? I should have a look to get that
into Rattle. Help (i.e., code or just code examples) is always welcome
:-)

Thanks,
Graham

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



      
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


