My bad. Confused density with %.

On Jan 31, 2008 7:50 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:

> >>>>> "NS" == Ng Stanley <stanleyngkl@gmail.com>
> >>>>>     on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:56:26 +0800 writes:
>
>    NS> Hi,
>    NS> Is this a bug from hist() ? The total density is greater than 1.
>
> no, the bug is in your thinking...
>
> Hint:   2 * 1/2 = 1
>
>    >> test
>    NS> [1]  0.05077802 -0.50585520 -0.98053648 -0.35513059  0.86767129
> 0.61736097
>    NS> [7]  0.14264062  0.26243841 -0.41477782  0.64172618  0.87230953 -
> 0.62570629
>    NS> [13]  0.43596467 -0.93214106 -0.26781599
>
>    >> h <- hist(test, freq = FALSE, main="Histogram of correlation", ylab
> =
>    NS> "Frequency", xlab = "Correlation", ylim =c(0.0, 1.0))
>    >> h$breaks
>    NS> [1] -1.0 -0.5  0.0  0.5  1.0
>    >> h$density
>    NS> [1] 0.5333332 0.4000000 0.5333333 0.5333333
>    >> h$counts
>    NS> [1] 4 3 4 4
>
>
>    NS> Thanks
>    NS> Stanley
>
>    NS> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>    NS> ______________________________________________
>    NS> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>    NS> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>    NS> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html<http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html>
>    NS> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

