

Peter Dalgaard schrieb:

>Knut Krueger <admin@biostatistic.de> writes:
>
>  
>
>>Peter Dalgaard schrieb:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>What is the real issue here? Import trouble? If you're importing to
>>>Word/PowerPoint, why not use the Windows metafile? Perhaps they are
>>>too ugly compared to EPS by your taste?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>My reason was
>>http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/328541.html
>>    
>>
>
>Oh, lovely.....
> 
>
isn't it ? :-( 

>Stupid question: You did remember to close the graphics device when
>you generated those plots (dev.off())? 
>  
>
the first idea was no I didn´t ... but I found my script and I did :-)

>If an EPS file doesn't work with an Adobe product, there is some
>reason to suspect that the file is corrupted or that there is an issue
>with R's postscript driver. If you're seeing text corruption outside
>the plot, then surely the E in EPS (for "encapsulated") is not working
>as intended. 
>  
>
That's a normal behaviour in windows surrounding.

>Did you try the pdf() driver? That usually comes out rather nicely in
>connection with Acrobat/Distiller.
>  
>
No I did not actually.
the plots are good enough for printing with an laser printer, but they 
are not good enough for the journal.
It is curious. one of them wants only pdf the other one wants tiff and 
wordperfect or word .. maybe the next one will receive old latin stone 
plates ;-)

Therefore  for one journal  it is enough to use the eps or bmp 
resolution with pdf file or just an pdf output, but for the next one I 
will need a tiff with 300 dpi at least.


 
with regards
Knut Krueger
http://www.biostatistic.de


	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]


