[R] Is there a sexy way ...?

[@vi@e@gross m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com]

Admit it, Rolf. Haven't you wondered if S, in a more private way, is sexier than R?

OK, kidding aside, we have talked this to death.

Just FYI, the conversation was stimulating for some of us and I have continued on my own and located functions I see as useful in the stringi and stringr packages to make my silly version ever less silly! LOL!


-----Original Message-----
From: Rolf Turner <rolfturner using posteo.net> 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2024 10:11 PM
To: CALUM POLWART <polc1410 using gmail.com>
Cc: avi.e.gross using gmail.com; Lennart Kasserra <lennart.kasserra using gmail.com>; r-help using r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Is there a sexy way ...?



On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:31 +0100
CALUM POLWART <polc1410 using gmail.com> wrote:

> Avi
> 
> I fear this was all a huge social experiment.
> 
> Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement...

<SNIP>

I conjecture that this conjecture was tongue-in-cheek.  Be that as it
were 😊️, let me assure everyone that such was not my intention.  The
usage is just my manner of speaking.

cheers,

Rolf

-- 
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
         +64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619