[R] Best way to test for numeric digits?
Leonard Mada
|eo@m@d@ @end|ng |rom @yon|c@eu
Wed Oct 18 20:35:38 CEST 2023
Dear Rui,
On 10/18/2023 8:45 PM, Rui Barradas wrote:
> split_chem_elements <- function(x, rm.digits = TRUE) {
> regex <- "(?<=[A-Z])(?![a-z]|$)|(?<=.)(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[a-z])(?=[^a-z])"
> if(rm.digits) {
> stringr::str_replace_all(mol, regex, "#") |>
> strsplit("#|[[:digit:]]") |>
> lapply(\(x) x[nchar(x) > 0L])
> } else {
> strsplit(x, regex, perl = TRUE)
> }
> }
>
> split.symbol.character = function(x, rm.digits = TRUE) {
> # Perl is partly broken in R 4.3, but this works:
> regex <- "(?<=[A-Z])(?![a-z]|$)|(?<=.)(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[a-z])(?=[^a-z])"
> s <- strsplit(x, regex, perl = TRUE)
> if(rm.digits) {
> s <- lapply(s, \(x) x[grep("[[:digit:]]+", x, invert = TRUE)])
> }
> s
> }
You have a glitch (mol is hardcoded) in the code of the first function.
The times are similar, after correcting for that glitch.
Note:
- grep("[[:digit:]]", ...) behaves almost twice as slow as grep("[0-9]",
...)!
- corrected results below;
Sincerely,
Leonard
#######
split_chem_elements <- function(x, rm.digits = TRUE) {
regex <- "(?<=[A-Z])(?![a-z]|$)|(?<=.)(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[a-z])(?=[^a-z])"
if(rm.digits) {
stringr::str_replace_all(x, regex, "#") |>
strsplit("#|[[:digit:]]") |>
lapply(\(x) x[nchar(x) > 0L])
} else {
strsplit(x, regex, perl = TRUE)
}
}
split.symbol.character = function(x, rm.digits = TRUE) {
# Perl is partly broken in R 4.3, but this works:
regex <- "(?<=[A-Z])(?![a-z]|$)|(?<=.)(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[a-z])(?=[^a-z])"
s <- strsplit(x, regex, perl = TRUE)
if(rm.digits) {
s <- lapply(s, \(x) x[grep("[0-9]", x, invert = TRUE)])
}
s
}
mol <- c("CCl3F", "Li4Al4H16", "CCl2CO2AlPO4SiO4Cl")
mol10000 <- rep(mol, 10000)
system.time(
split_chem_elements(mol10000)
)
# user system elapsed
# 0.58 0.00 0.58
system.time(
split.symbol.character(mol10000)
)
# user system elapsed
# 0.67 0.00 0.67
More information about the R-help
mailing list