[R] question about the difference of AIC()
Jinsong Zhao
j@zh@o @end|ng |rom ye@h@net
Wed May 12 14:07:33 CEST 2021
On 2021/5/12 19:49, Jinsong Zhao wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I learned that AIC = 2 * npar - 2 * log(logLik(model)), where k is the
> number of estimated parameters in the model.
k should be npar in the above sentence. Sorry for the mistake.
>
> For examle:
> > set.seed(123)
> > y <- rnorm(15)
> > fm <- lm(y ~ 1)
> In this example, npar should be 1, so, AIC is:
> > 2*1 - 2 * logLik(fm)
> 'log Lik.' 38.49275 (df=2)
>
> However, AIC() give:
> > AIC(fm)
> [1] 40.49275
>
> I also try another AIC extract function:
> > extractAIC(fm)
> [1] 1.000000 -4.075406
>
> Since extractAIC() does not include the constant: n + n * log(2 * pi), so:
> > extractAIC(fm)[2] + 15 + 15 * log(2 * pi)
> [1] 38.49275
>
> It equals to the AIC calculated by 2*1 - 2 * logLik(fm), but different
> with the return of AIC().
>
> It seems that AIC use 2 * (npar + 1) instead of 2 * npar.
>
> In the help page of logLik, it said:
> '"df"' (*d*egrees of *f*reedom), giving the number of (estimated)
> parameters in the model.
>
> The "df" is used by AIC() as npar, however, "df" is not number of
> estimated parameters in the model, df - 1 is. Am I correct?
>
> Best wishes,
> Jinsong
More information about the R-help
mailing list