[R] Augmented Dickie-Fuller test

[John C Frain]

Your series shows a strong seasonal pattern that looks fairly constant.   I
would think that the adf style test is not appropriate.  What are you
trying to achieve?


John C Frain
3 Aranleigh Park
Rathfarnham
Dublin 14
Ireland
www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.html
https://jcfrain.wordpress.com/
https://jcfraincv19.wordpress.com/

mailto:frainj using tcd.ie
mailto:frainj using gmail.com


On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 14:24, Nick Wray <nickmwray using gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello: I've downloaded this dataset, and when I plot it it is clearly
> non-stationary
>
>
> df <- read.csv('
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourcodingclub/CC-time-series/master/monthly_milk.csv
> ')
>
> plot(df,type="l")
>
> But when I apply the Augmented Dickie-Fuller Test I get a p value of 0.01,
> implying that there is evidence to reject the null that the series is
> non-stationary. I am puzzled as to why this is happening. Is this because
> the confidence level is basically too high or is something else going on?
>
> adf.test(df[,2])
>
> Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test
>
> data: df[, 2] Dickey-Fuller = -9.9714, Lag order = 5, p-value = 0.01
> alternative hypothesis: stationary
>
> Thanks Nick Wray
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]