[R] Strange behavior when sampling rows of a data frame
Rui Barradas
ru|pb@rr@d@@ @end|ng |rom @@po@pt
Fri Jun 19 19:37:51 CEST 2020
Hello,
Thanks, I hadn't thought of that.
But, why? Is it evaluated once before assignment and a second time when
the assignment occurs?
To trace both sample and `[<-` gives 2 calls to sample.
trace(sample)
trace(`[<-`)
df[sample(nrow(df), 3),]$treated <- TRUE
trace: sample(nrow(df), 3)
trace: `[<-`(`*tmp*`, sample(nrow(df), 3), , value = list(unit = c(7L,
6L, 8L), treated = c(TRUE, TRUE, TRUE)))
trace: sample(nrow(df), 3)
Regards,
Rui Barradas
Às 17:20 de 19/06/2020, William Dunlap escreveu:
> The first subscript argument is getting evaluated twice.
> > trace(sample)
> > set.seed(2020); df[i<-sample(10,3), ]$Treated <- TRUE
> trace: sample(10, 3)
> trace: sample(10, 3)
> > i
> [1] 1 10 4
> > set.seed(2020); sample(10,3)
> trace: sample(10, 3)
> [1] 7 6 8
> > sample(10,3)
> trace: sample(10, 3)
> [1] 1 10 4
>
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:46 AM Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas using sapo.pt
> <mailto:ruipbarradas using sapo.pt>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't have an answer on the reason why this happens but it seems
> like
> a bug. Where?
>
> In which of `[<-.data.frame` or `[<-.default`?
>
> A solution is to subset and assign the vector:
>
>
> set.seed(2020)
> df2 <- data.frame(unit = 1:10)
> df2$treated <- FALSE
>
> df2$treated[sample(nrow(df2), 3)] <- TRUE
> df2
> # unit treated
> #1 1 FALSE
> #2 2 FALSE
> #3 3 FALSE
> #4 4 FALSE
> #5 5 FALSE
> #6 6 TRUE
> #7 7 TRUE
> #8 8 TRUE
> #9 9 FALSE
> #10 10 FALSE
>
>
> Or
>
>
> set.seed(2020)
> df3 <- data.frame(unit = 1:10)
> df3$treated <- FALSE
>
> df3[sample(nrow(df3), 3), "treated"] <- TRUE
> df3
> # result as expected
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Rui Barradas
>
>
>
> Às 13:49 de 19/06/2020, Sébastien Lahaie escreveu:
> > I ran into some strange behavior in R when trying to assign a
> treatment to
> > rows in a data frame. I'm wondering whether any R experts can
> explain
> > what's going on.
> >
> > First, let's assign a treatment to 3 out of 10 rows as follows.
> >
> >> df <- data.frame(unit = 1:10)
> >> df$treated <- FALSE
> >> s <- sample(nrow(df), 3)
> >> df[s,]$treated <- TRUE
> >> df
> > unit treated
> >
> > 1 1 FALSE
> >
> > 2 2 TRUE
> >
> > 3 3 FALSE
> >
> > 4 4 FALSE
> >
> > 5 5 TRUE
> >
> > 6 6 FALSE
> >
> > 7 7 TRUE
> >
> > 8 8 FALSE
> >
> > 9 9 FALSE
> >
> > 10 10 FALSE
> >
> > This is as expected. Now we'll just skip the intermediate step
> of saving
> > the sampled indices, and apply the treatment directly as follows.
> >
> >> df <- data.frame(unit = 1:10)
> >> df$treated <- FALSE
> >> df[sample(nrow(df), 3),]$treated <- TRUE
> >> df
> > unit treated
> >
> > 1 6 TRUE
> >
> > 2 2 FALSE
> >
> > 3 3 FALSE
> >
> > 4 9 TRUE
> >
> > 5 5 FALSE
> >
> > 6 6 FALSE
> >
> > 7 7 FALSE
> >
> > 8 5 TRUE
> >
> > 9 9 FALSE
> >
> > 10 10 FALSE
> >
> > Now the data frame still has 10 rows with 3 assigned to the
> treatment. But
> > the units are garbled. Units 1 and 4 have disappeared, for
> instance, and
> > there are duplicates for 6 and 9, one assigned to treatment and
> the other
> > to control. Why would this happen?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sebastien
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-help using r-project.org <mailto:R-help using r-project.org> mailing list
> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> --
> Este e-mail foi verificado em termos de vírus pelo software
> antivírus Avast.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help using r-project.org <mailto:R-help using r-project.org> mailing list --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Este e-mail foi verificado em termos de vírus pelo software antivírus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the R-help
mailing list