[R] OT --- grammar.
dw|n@em|u@ @end|ng |rom comc@@t@net
Tue Jun 26 04:27:13 CEST 2018
I’m surprised no on has reference the F distribution where the degrees of freedom are manifestly plural.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 6:05 PM, John <jwd using surewest.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:16:24 -0400
> JRG <loesljrg using accucom.net> wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2018 08:03 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>>> Ted, et. al.:
>>> Re: "Data is" vs "data are" ... Heh heh!
>>> "This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
>>> (Attributed to Churchill in one form or another, likely wrongly.)
>>> See here for some semi-authoritative dicussion:
>> Hmmm. "semi-authoritative or not", the 1980 Edition of the Oxford
>> American dictionary says:
>> "data (day-ta) n. pl. facts or information ... 'Data' should not be
>> used with a singular verb, as in 'the data is inconclusive'; it is by
>> origin a Latin plural (the singular is 'datum') and should be used
>> with a plural verb. ..."
>> Interesting how Latin seemed to have changed in the past 40 or so
> In fact, "the data are/is inconclusive" is shorthand for a longer
> sentence. Data are merely observations. It is only after they are
> made and summarized that a conclusion might be reached. In which
> case it was the analysis of the data that was inconclusive. Since many
> analyses of a single data set can be conducted and they are not
> necessarily all going to be inconclusive, it really never was the data
> that were inconclusive.
> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help