[R] Fleming-Harrington weighted log rank test

[array chip]

 Thank you David!
    On Wednesday, February 14, 2018, 6:05:46 PM PST, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:  
 
 
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 5:26 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:02 PM, array chip via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all, 
>> 
>> The survdiff() from survival package has an argument "rho" that implements Fleming-Harrington weighted long rank test. 
>> 
>> But according to several sources including "survminer" package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survminer/vignettes/Specifiying_weights_in_log-rank_comparisons.html), Fleming-Harrington weighted log-rank test should have 2 parameters "p" and "q" to control the weighting for earlier vs later times in the follow-up.
>> 
>> For example, setting rho=1 in survdiff() uses the Peto-Peto modification of Gehan-Wilcox weights, which I can confirm by setting p=1 & 1=0 in comp() from survminer package. similarly rho=0 is equivalent to p=0 & q=0
>> 
>> I am interested in putting more weights on survival difference in later follow-up time. According to comp() from survminer package, that would set p=0 & q=1 for Fleming-Harrington weights. 
>> 
>> My question is how I can do the same by setting certain values for "rho" in the regular survival() function?
> 
> I think that survdiff uses a different version than what you have found. The G-rho family weights are:
> 
> w_j = [Sˆ(tj)]^ρ
> 
> So rather than two parameters on S(t) and (1-S(t)) as in the p,q version, you only have one parameter applied to S(t). This class handout says that the G-rho,gamma weighting scheme is not available in survdiff.
> 

Forgot to paste the link:

http://www.ics.uci.edu/~dgillen/STAT255/Handouts/lecture4.pdf

> -- 
> David Winsemius
> Alameda, CA, USA
> 
> 'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'  -Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA

'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'  -Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law




  
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]