[R] help

[Jeff Newmiller]

Microsoft Word documents are inappropriate, and attachments almost always get stripped by the mailing list.

Please read the referenced information this time before trying again, and especially the Posting Guide. 
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

On November 21, 2017 8:15:11 AM PST, yadav neog <yadavneog at gmail.com> wrote:
>thank you for your valuable reply. I  have attached my commands,
>results, and
>data with this mail..maybe it will be beneficial for you to feedback.
>
>On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Newmiller
><jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>
>wrote:
>
>> Your example is incomplete... as the bottom of this and every post
>says,
>> we need to be able to proceed from an empty R environment to wherever
>you
>> are having the problem (reproducible), in as few steps as possible
>> (minimal). The example needs to include data, preferably in R syntax
>as the
>> dput function creates... see the howtos referenced below for help
>with
>> that.  [1], [2], [3]
>>
>> You also need to set your email program to send plain text format,
>since
>> HTML gets mangled to various degrees as it gets forced into text
>format
>> going through the mailing list. Read the Posting Guide.
>>
>> A wild guess is that you have negative values in your data or too few
>data
>> points...
>>
>> [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-
>> a-great-r-reproducible-example
>>
>> [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html
>>
>> [3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reprex/index.html (read
>the
>> vignette)
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> On November 21, 2017 12:48:08 AM PST, yadav neog
><yadavneog at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >I am working on  Johansen cointegration test,  using urca and var
>> >package.
>> >in the selection of var, I have got following results.
>> >
>> >>VARselect(newd, lag.max = 10,type = "none")
>> >
>> >$selection
>> >AIC(n)  HQ(n)  SC(n) FPE(n)
>> >     6      6      6      5
>> >
>> >$criteria
>> >                   1             2             3             4
>> > 5    6    7    8    9
>> >AIC(n) -3.818646e+01 -3.864064e+01 -3.833435e+01 -4.089169e+01
>> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf
>> >HQ(n)  -3.754345e+01 -3.744647e+01 -3.658903e+01 -3.859523e+01
>> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf
>> >SC(n)  -3.630096e+01 -3.513899e+01 -3.321655e+01 -3.415775e+01
>> > NaN -Inf -Inf -Inf -Inf
>> >FPE(n)  2.700145e-17  2.114513e-17  5.350381e-17  2.035215e-17
>> >-9.147714e-65    0    0    0    0
>> >         10
>> >AIC(n) -Inf
>> >HQ(n)  -Inf
>> >SC(n)  -Inf
>> >FPE(n)    0
>> >
>> >Warning messages:
>> >1: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced
>> >2: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced
>> >3: In log(sigma.det) : NaNs produced
>> >
>> >so do in my ca.jo test... I have found similar NaNs results. please
>> >help me
>> >in solving the problem.
>> >Yadawananda Neog
>> >Research Scholar
>> >Department of Economics
>> >Banaras Hindu University
>> >Mob. 9838545073
>> >
>> >       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >
>> >______________________________________________
>> >R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> >PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> >http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>