[R] Persistent state in a function?
Bert Gunter
bgunter.4567 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 17:06:22 CET 2016
Yes, Duncan. My statement was wrong. I should have said that it's the
environment/evaluation frame of f = g(). Thank you for the correction.
Still, I hope my example was helpful.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
and sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/03/2016 11:19 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>>
>> Martin, All:
>>
>> A very nice point! Perhaps the following may help to illustrate it.
>>
>> g <- function(){
>> x <- NULL
>> function(y){cat("result is ",x," \n"); x <<- y}
>> }
>>
>>
>> > f <- g()
>>
>> > rm(g) # g is deleted but its environment remains as the environment of f
>
>
> That's not quite the jargon we use. The environment of g would probably be
> the global environment. The thing that gets left behind is the evaluation
> frame (or environment) of the call g(). Its parent environment is the
> environment of g.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>>
>>
>> > f(1)
>> result is
>>
>> > f(3)
>> result is 1
>>
>> > f(5)
>> result is 3
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Bert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bert Gunter
>>
>> "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
>> and sticking things into it."
>> -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Martin Maechler
>> <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> on Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:57:56 -0400 writes:
>> >
>> > > On 19/03/2016 12:45 PM, Boris Steipe wrote:
>> > >> Dear all -
>> > >>
>> > >> I need to have a function maintain a persistent lookup table of
>> > results for an expensive calculation, a named vector or hash. I know that I
>> > can just keep the table in the global environment. One problem with this
>> > approach is that the function should be able to delete/recalculate the table
>> > and I don't like side-effects in the global environment. This table really
>> > should be private. What I don't know is:
>> > >> -A- how can I keep the table in an environment that is private to
>> > the function but persistent for the session?
>> > >> -B- how can I store and reload such table?
>> > >> -C- most importantly: is that the right strategy to initialize
>> > and maintain state in a function in the first place?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> For illustration ...
>> > >>
>> > >> -----------------------------------
>> > >>
>> > >> myDist <- function(a, b) {
>> > >> # retrieve or calculate distances
>> > >> if (!exists("Vals")) {
>> > >> Vals <<- numeric() # the lookup table for distance values
>> > >> # here, created in the global env.
>> > >> }
>> > >> key <- sprintf("X%d.%d", a, b)
>> > >> thisDist <- Vals[key]
>> > >> if (is.na(thisDist)) { # Hasn't been calculated yet ...
>> > >> cat("Calculating ... ")
>> > >> thisDist <- sqrt(a^2 + b^2) # calculate with some expensive
>> > function ...
>> > >> Vals[key] <<- thisDist # store in global table
>> > >> }
>> > >> return(thisDist)
>> > >> }
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> # run this
>> > >> set.seed(112358)
>> > >>
>> > >> for (i in 1:10) {
>> > >> x <- sample(1:3, 2)
>> > >> print(sprintf("d(%d, %d) = %f", x[1], x[2], myDist(x[1], x[2])))
>> > >> }
>> >
>> >
>> > > Use local() to create a persistent environment for the function.
>> > For
>> > > example:
>> >
>> > > f <- local({
>> > > x <- NULL
>> > > function(y) {
>> > > cat("last x was ", x, "\n")
>> > > x <<- y
>> > > }
>> > > })
>> >
>> > > Then:
>> >
>> > >> f(3)
>> > > last x was
>> > >> f(4)
>> > > last x was 3
>> > >> f(12)
>> > > last x was 4
>> >
>> > > Duncan Murdoch
>> >
>> > Yes, indeed.
>> > Or use another function {than 'local()'} which returns a
>> > function: The functions approxfun(), splinefun() and ecdf()
>> > are "base R" functions which return functions "with a
>> > non-trivial environment" as I use to say.
>> >
>> > Note that this is *the* proper R way solving your problem.
>> >
>> > The fact that this works as it works is called "lexical scoping"
>> > and also the reason why (((regular, i.e., non-primitive)))
>> > functions in R are called closures.
>> > When R was created > 20 years ago, this has been the
>> > distinguishing language feature of R (in comparison to S / S-plus).
>> >
>> > Enjoy! - Martin
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________
>> > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list