[R] Fw: Multiple Integrals
David Winsemius
dwinsemius at comcast.net
Mon Aug 31 00:48:46 CEST 2015
On Aug 30, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Shant Ch via R-help wrote:
> Thank you very much to all for all your responses.
>
> @Dr. Winsemius, E[f(X)] >=f(E(X)) if f is convex. Now we know |x| is convex function, so clearly in this scenario if we compute the expectation of the ((X1+X2+X3)/3-X4) and then take the absolute, then, we will get a lower bound of the expectation I want to find.
>
I understood the error in my thinking when Jeff Newmiller pointed out the minus sign that I had missed.
Thanks;
David.
> On Saturday, August 29, 2015 7:24 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 29, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Shant Ch via R-help wrote:
>
>> Hello Dr. Berry,
>>
>> I know the theoretical side but note we are not talking about expectation of sums rather expectation of ABSOLUTE value of the function (X1/3+X2/3+X3/3-X4), i.e. E|X1/3+X2/3+X3/3-X4| , I don't think this can be handled for log normal distribution by integrals by hand.
>>
>
> To Shnant Ch;
>
> I admit to puzzlement (being a humble country doctor). Can you explain why there should be a difference between the absolute value of an expectation for a sum of values from a function, in this case dlnorm, that is positive definite versus an expectation simply of the sum of such values?
>
> --
>
> David Winsemius
> Alameda, CA, USA
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA
More information about the R-help
mailing list