[R] Scatterplot and Causality
rbaer at atsu.edu
Mon Apr 22 17:27:05 CEST 2013
On 4/22/2013 9:48 AM, Lorenzo Isella wrote:
> Dear All,
> I hope this is not too off topic.
> I am given a set of scatteplots (nothing too fancy; think about a
> normal x-y 2D plot).
> I do not deal with two time series (indeed I have no info about time).
> If I call A=(A1,A2,...) and B=(B1, B2, ...) the 2 variables (two
> vectors of numbers most of the case, but sometimes they can be
> categorical variables), I can plot one against the other and I
> essentially I need to determine whether
> A=f(B, noise) or B=g(A, noise)
> where the noise is the effect of other possibly unknown variables,
> measurement errors etc.... and f and g are two functions.
> Without the noise, if I want to test if A=f(B) [B causes A], then I
> need at least to ensure that f(B1)!=f(B2) must imply B1!=B2 (different
> effects must have a different cause), whereas it is not ruled out that
> f(B1)=f(B2) for B1!=B2 (different causes may lead to the same effect).
> However, in presence of the noise, these properties will hold only
> approximately so....any idea about how a statistical test, rather than
> eyeballing, to tell apart A=f(B, noise) vs B=g(A, noise)?
> Any suggestion is welcome.
It strikes me that this is not a particularly productive approach to
causality, particularly in an observational setting. You would need to
design an experiment where you had a known manipulation of an
explanatory variable and studied the change in a response variable, and
then, you came back with the roles reversed. I don't think R or indeed
any statistical package can help you here.
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Robert W. Baer, Ph.D.
Professor of Physiology
Kirksille College of Osteopathic Medicine
A. T. Still University of Health Sciences
Kirksville, MO 63501 USA
More information about the R-help