[R] Factor to numeric conversion - as.numeric(as.character(f))[f] - Language definition seems to say to not use this.
Peter Ehlers
ehlers at ucalgary.ca
Mon Apr 1 20:49:52 CEST 2013
On 2013-04-01 10:48, Matthew Lundberg wrote:
> These two seem to be at odds. Is this the case?
>
>>From help(factor) - section Warning:
>
> To transform a factor f to approximately its original numeric values,
> as.numeric(levels(f))[f] is recommended and slightly more efficient than
> as.numeric(as.character(f)).
>
>>From the language definition - section 2.3.1:
>
> Factors are currently implemented using an integer array to specify the
> actual levels and
> a second array of names that are mapped to the integers. Rather
> unfortunately users often
> make use of the implementation in order to make some calculations easier.
> This, however,
> is an implementation issue and is not guaranteed to hold in all
> implementations of R.
Hint:
f <- factor(sample(5, 10, TRUE))
as.numeric(levels(f))[f]
g <- factor(sample(letters[1:5], 10, TRUE))
as.numeric(levels(g))[g]
Peter Ehlers
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list