[R] patch download?

Jeff Newmiller jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us
Thu Oct 4 04:33:15 CEST 2012


That is silly. The primary difference is that certain bugfix patches have been applied.  A side-effect of this "first patched" status is that unintentional bugs may have been introduced, so unless you have already encountered a bug that was patched there then you are likely better off sticking with the standard release. That said, I have had no qualms about using a patched version when I encountered a bug that got fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller                        The     .....       .....  Go Live...
DCN:<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>        Basics: ##.#.       ##.#.  Live Go...
                                      Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries            O.O#.       #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)               .OO#.       .OO#.  rocks...1k
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

"Poggio, John" <jpoggio at ku.edu> wrote:

>Is the primary difference between the current version download (e.g.,
>2.15.1) and the "patched" download of these R files that the patched
>files have NOT been verified?  Please confirm and thanks!
>
>	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.




More information about the R-help mailing list