[R] e1071 SVM: Cross-validation error confusion matrix

signal bfeeny at mac.com
Wed Nov 21 07:08:09 CET 2012


Did you ever receive a response to this? I did not see one public.

I would think that if your dataset was of a large enough size, that 10-fold
validation would show an improvement over N:N.

Also, any ideas if there is any difference really in using fitted() vs.
predict() in your second step? I am pretty sure they do the same thing.  

Brian



--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/e1071-SVM-Cross-validation-error-confusion-matrix-tp4437047p4650252.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the R-help mailing list