[R] Correct Interpretation of survreg() coeffs
wwreith
reith_william at bah.com
Fri May 4 15:43:53 CEST 2012
Am I correct in assuming that the output below essentially translates to
"Males have a mean time that is significantly lower than Females"? Is this
the correct way to interpret the fact that the coefficient is negative?
Assume the variale sex is treated as a factor with Female =0 and Male=1.
survmodel<-survreg(survobj~sex,data=data1, dist="weibull")
survsum<-summary(survmodel)
survsum
Value Std. Error z p
SexMale -0.47830 0.3745 -1.2770 2.02e-01
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Correct-Interpretation-of-survreg-coeffs-tp4608655.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the R-help
mailing list