[R] Using !is.na() in a HAVING clause in sqldf() XXXX
Phil Spector
spector at stat.berkeley.edu
Tue Jan 17 22:44:32 CET 2012
Dan -
Try using "having Premie not null" instead of
"having !is.na(Premie)" .
- Phil Spector
Statistical Computing Facility
Department of Statistics
UC Berkeley
spector at stat.berkeley.edu
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Dan Abner wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have the following:
>
> sqldf("select Premie,count(tpounds) N,avg(tpounds) Avg_Weight,
> stddev_samp(tpounds) StdDev
> from children
> group by Premie
> having !is.na(Premie)")
>
> sqldf() does not like the !is.na(Premie) specification. How does one
> exclude a "missing" group in an aggregated query using sqldf()?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dan
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list