[R] Re : Sort out number on value

[Jeff Newmiller]

I think

x[x>7.5]

gives more unsurprising results when none of the data meets the criteria than

 x[which(x>7.5)]

does.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller                        The     .....       .....  Go Live...
DCN:<jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>        Basics: ##.#.       ##.#.  Live Go...
                                      Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries            O.O#.       #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)               .OO#.       .OO#.  rocks...1k
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:

>
>On Apr 20, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Yellow wrote:
>
>> I now filtered the Na and Inf out of my data.
>> And the number is exactly the same als the output from the excel
>file.
>>
>> Thanks everyone. :)
>> Now I can finish my work.
>
>In the future it might be safer to use subset() or perhaps  
>x[which(x>7.5)]. That would omit the NA or NaN values (although it  
>might not remove the Inf values, but I didn't realize the Excel had a  
>concept of Inf).
>
>-- 
>
>David Winsemius, MD
>West Hartford, CT
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.