[R] [OT] 1 vs 2-way anova technical question

Giovanni Azua bravegag at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 22:28:28 CET 2011

On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> we disagree is that I think data analysts with limited statistical
> backgrounds should consult with local statisticians instead of trying
> to muddle through on their own thru lists like this. This is not meant

I think that people lacking reading skills should not be subscribed in lists like this one, bullying and creating confusion around. 

I will asks as many times as I want/need and the way I use lists if none of your f. b. 

> to be arrogance on my part -- though it may seem to come across that
> way -- but rather a plea for good science. I believe that bad
> statistics --> bad science, a problem that I see as pervasive and
> inimical to scientific progress, especially in today's data saturated
> world.

> But enough of my off topic B.S. Please reply privately to not waste
> yet more space here (positively or negatively -- stone throwers need
> to catch them, too).

You are actually full of your off topic prime matter, you arrogant prick.

More information about the R-help mailing list