[R] lmer with 2 random effects with only two levels
gmd
grantcmcdonald at hotmail.com
Thu May 19 22:08:02 CEST 2011
Dear all,
I am analysing a data set based on 6 groups of individuals. Each group is
observed for 10 days. 5 days with one manipulation 5 days with another
manipulation. I therefore have 6 replicate groups (n=6) each with one mean
measurement for manipulation A and manipulation B. Each group consists of a
set of males and females. An independent group of males for each group
replicate, however there are only 2 sets of females each replicated 3 times
within the six groups.
data takes the from:
group response female set treatment
1 3.0 A high
2 3.0 B high
3 2.8 A high
4 2.6 B high
5 2.6 A high
6 2.9 B high
1 1.5 A low
2 1.4 B low
3 1.7 A low
4 1.9 B low
5 2.0 A low
6 2.1 B low
The order of treatment is counterbalanced and I would assume I would choose
to fit the model:
> model1<-lme(response~treat, random=~1|femaleset/group)
or
> model2<-lmer(response~treat+(1|femaleset/group))
However I am concerned with two aspcts: my small sample size of course but
also the use of a random effect of female set only has two levels (A and B).
Is there a more appropriate way to handle this analysis? A glm with female
group as an explanatory for instance such as:
model3<-glm(response~treatment+femaleset+treatment*femaleset). Although
yhis will not properly account for the pseudoreplication. Ant assistance or
help would be greatly appreciated.
Best
Colin
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lmer-with-2-random-effects-with-only-two-levels-tp3536791p3536791.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the R-help
mailing list