[R] which operating system + computer specifications lead to the best performance for R?
santosh.srinivas at gmail.com
Sun Jan 23 03:37:46 CET 2011
I've exactly the same question and it looks like most of the heavy users
from the threads I've followed use Unix/Linux/Mac.
Some threads have given rationale for a 64bit system due to memory benefits
but there seems to be not much buy-in from the guys here (so I'd give that a
pass). The CRAN page also isn't very excited about 64bit for now.
As David mentioned, Dirk's work seems to be hungry from speed and I closely
(try to) follow his work.
>From his blog, he uses a "Debian Linux system" and that is what I've set up
for myself. This obviously may just be a matter of coincidence.
(But, saves me a lot of time trying to figure out issues related to the
other OS's. Also, many authors of the packages that I use really don't have
the time or inclination to make is Windoze friendly.)
My 2p in transition.
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On
Behalf Of David Winsemius
Sent: 22 January 2011 21:02
To: Marc Jekel
Cc: r-help at r-project.org Help
Subject: Re: [R] which operating system + computer specifications lead to
the best performance for R?
On Jan 22, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Sascha Vieweg wrote:
> On 11-01-22 14:56, Marc Jekel wrote:
>> I have the opportunity to buy a new computer for my simulations in
>> R. My goal is to get the execution of R code as fast as possible. I
>> know that the number of cores and the working memory capacity are
>> crucial for computer performance but maybe someone has experience/
>> knowledge which comp specifications are especially crucial
>> (especially in relation to R). Is there any knowledge on the
>> performance of R for different operating systems (Linux, Win, Mac
>> etc.) resp. is performance dependent on the operating system at
>> all? Even small differences in performance (i.e., speed of
>> calculations) matter for me (quite large datasets + repeated
>> calculations etc.).
> Not really a recommendation, just my considerations: That depends on
> your budget, Mac Pro (5k$ in the U.S.) would probably serve your
> needs for a long time ;-). I am running R 2.12.0 on a MacBook Pro,
> 2.4 Dual Core with (only) 2G ram, together with (paid) TextMate as
> editor, and Sweave. 2G ram is few! And I noted remarkable
> improvements whan I was lucky to use a MBP Intel Core i5 for a
> couple of days. Whatever processor and memory, I like the easy
> interplay between R and the Unix environment (things like passing
> shell commands from R to my system or other interpreters), easy
> graphics etc.
I also use a MacPro (circa early 1998) R 2.12.1 with 24 GB and still
find it generally very capable for a dataset of 5.5 MM rows and about
150 variables using the survival and rms packages. I seem to remember
a price of 4KUS$ but I didn't write that check. I haven't succeeded in
getting the multi-processor applications to work, however, and my
guess is that Linux boxes (and Linux users) may be more likely to
offer paths to success if that is an expectation. I am mostly
interested in having adequate memory space for one core anyway, as
most of the packages I use don't seem to be set up for parallel
It may depend on what development system you use and which packages
you expect to install. I know there are people with the StatET-
equipped systems out there but I have never been able to get a working
setup on my Mac. Too many moving parts and the gears don't seem to
mesh out of the box. Same with GTK2+ and its R friends.
This would be better posted on the HPC mailing list anyway:
You might want to search with "Dirk Eddelbuettel" in your search
string, since he seems to share your "need for speed" and has
championed various approaches to High Performance Computing with R:
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
More information about the R-help