[R] ddply from plyr package - any alternatives?

[Matthew Dowle]

Adam,

> because I did not have time to entirely test

Do you (or does your company) have an automated test suite in place?

R 2.10.0 is nearly two years old,  and R 2.12.0 is nearly one.

Matthew

"AdamMarczak" <adam.marczak at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1314385041626-3771731.post at n4.nabble.com...
> No, it's not much faster. I'd say it's faster about 10-15% in my case.
>
> I dont want neither plyr or data.table package because our software on the
> server does not support R version  over 2.10 and both of them have
> dependency for R >= 2.12. Also I do not want to use old archives because I
> did not have time to entirely test them as it was quick demand for
> workaround.
>
> Best regards,
> Adam.
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ddply-from-plyr-package-any-alternatives-tp3765936p3771731.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>