[R] Efficiency Question - Nested lapply or nested for loop
Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendieck at gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 18:47:49 CEST 2010
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:35 AM, epowell <EPowell1 at med.miami.edu> wrote:
>
> My data looks like this:
>
>> data
> name G_hat_0_0 G_hat_1_0 G_hat_2_0 G_0 G_hat_0_1 G_hat_1_1 G_hat_2_1 G_1
> 1 rs0 0.488000 0.448625 0.063375 1 0.480875 0.454500 0.064625 1
> 2 rs1 0.002375 0.955375 0.042250 1 0.000000 0.062875 0.937125 2
> 3 rs2 0.050375 0.835875 0.113750 1 0.877250 0.115875 0.006875 0
> 4 rs3 0.000000 0.074750 0.925250 2 0.897750 0.102000 0.000250 0
> 5 rs4 0.000125 0.052375 0.947500 2 0.261500 0.724125 0.014375 1
> 6 rs5 0.003750 0.092125 0.904125 2 0.023000 0.738125 0.238875 1
>
> And my task is:
> For each individual (X) on each row, to find the index corresponding to the
> max of G_hat_X_0, G_hat_X_1, G_hat_X_2 and then increment the cell of the
> confusion matrix with the row corresponding to that index and the column
> corresponding to G_X.
>
> For example, in the first row and the first individual, the index with the
> max value (0.488000) is 0 and the G_0 value is 1, so I would increment
> matrix index of the first row and second column. (Note that the ranges
> between rows and columns are one off. That is accounted for in the code.)
>
> In reality the data will be much bigger, containing 10000 rows and a
> variable number of columns (inds) between 10 and 500.
>
> The correct result is:
>
>> cmat
> tru_rr tru_rv tru_vv
> call_rr 2 2 0
> call_rv 0 4 0
> call_vv 0 0 4
>
If we reform data into a 3d array, arr, it can be vectorized like this
where the two args of table correspond to Gmax and Gtru:
arr <- array(t(data[-1]), c(4, 2, 6))
table(apply(arr[-4,,], 2:3, which.max), arr[4,,] + 1)
--
Statistics & Software Consulting
GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
More information about the R-help
mailing list