[R] Sweave cutting new lines

[Florian Burkart]

Hi Thierry,

unfortunately, that does not seem to work for me.

On 10/06/2010 14:19, ONKELINX, Thierry wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Have you tried to replace each '\n' with '\r\n'. That did the trick for
> me.
>
> HTH,
>
> Thierry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> ir. Thierry Onkelinx
> Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek
> team Biometrie&  Kwaliteitszorg
> Gaverstraat 4
> 9500 Geraardsbergen
> Belgium
>
> Research Institute for Nature and Forest
> team Biometrics&  Quality Assurance
> Gaverstraat 4
> 9500 Geraardsbergen
> Belgium
>
> tel. + 32 54/436 185
> Thierry.Onkelinx at inbo.be
> www.inbo.be
>
> To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
> than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to
> say what the experiment died of.
> ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
>
> The plural of anecdote is not data.
> ~ Roger Brinner
>
> The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
> ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of
> data.
> ~ John Tukey
>
>
>    
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: r-help-bounces at r-project.org
>> [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] Namens Florian Burkart
>> Verzonden: donderdag 10 juni 2010 14:44
>> Aan: r-help at r-project.org
>> Onderwerp: [R] Sweave cutting new lines
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have trouble with Sweave (I think) cutting of my newlines.
>>
>> As stated in the help of Sweave, I generate tex code straight
>> from R for dynamically computed reports.
>>
>> If I do this in R:
>>
>> for (i in 0:4) {cat("\n",i,"\n")};cat("\n 3")
>>
>>    0
>>
>>    1
>>
>>    2
>>
>>    3
>>
>>    4
>>
>>    3
>>
>> The output looks correct.
>>
>> However, Sweave for some reason seems to trim everything
>> outside forloops. Hence, this
>>
>> <<results=tex,echo=FALSE>>=
>> sec<-0
>> lambda<-0
>> chartvalue<-"b"
>> relsec<-0
>> for (chartvalue in c("b","beta")) {
>>       for (relsec in 0:(e("count pd")-2)) {
>>
>> file<-paste("working/frontfile",sec,"x",lambda,"x",chartvalue,
>> "x",relsec,".pdf",sep="")
>>           pdf(file=file,paper="special",width=14,height=6)
>>           correl.plotsinglechart(sec,lambda,chartvalue,relsec)
>>           tmp<-dev.off()
>>           cat("\\includegraphics{",file,"}\n\n",sep="")
>>       }
>> }
>> chartvalue<-"rsq"
>> relsec<-0
>> file<-paste("working/frontfile",sec,"x",lambda,"x",chartvalue,
>> "x",relsec,".pdf",sep="")
>> pdf(file=file,paper="special",width=14,height=6)
>> correl.plotsinglechart(sec,lambda,chartvalue,relsec)
>> tmp<-dev.off()
>> cat("\n\\newline\\includegraphics{",file,"}\n\n",sep="")
>> @
>>
>> gets converted to this
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbx0.pdf}
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbx1.pdf}
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbx2.pdf}
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbetax0.pdf}
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbetax1.pdf}
>>
>> \includegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xbetax2.pdf}\newline\incl
>> udegraphics{working/frontfile0x0xrsqx0.pdf}
>>
>>
>>
>> This actually works now because the \newline takes care of
>> the line break, but it is not very pretty.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know why Sweave behaves this way? Is there a way
>> to fix it
>> (besides working in another R chunk)? Maybe I am just being silly...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>      
> Druk dit bericht a.u.b. niet onnodig af.
> Please do not print this message unnecessarily.
>
> Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen geven enkel de visie van de schrijver weer
> en binden het INBO onder geen enkel beding, zolang dit bericht niet bevestigd is
> door een geldig ondertekend document. The views expressed in  this message
> and any annex are purely those of the writer and may not be regarded as stating
> an official position of INBO, as long as the message is not confirmed by a duly
> signed document.
>
>