[R] if using ginv function, does it mean there is no need to use solve function any more?

[Bill.Venables at csiro.au]

ginv() is slower than solve().  This is the price you pay for more generality.

-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of song song
Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 10:21 AM
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: [R] if using ginv function, does it mean there is no need to use solve function any more?

since ginv can deal with both singular and non-singular conditions, is there
any other difference between them?

if I use ginv only, will be any problem?

thanks

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.