[R] Na.omit on matrix, does the matrix have to have a limited size

[Peter Alspach]

Tena koe Anna

Presumably because only 69 rows of your matrix have no missing values in
any column?

HTH ....

Peter Alspach 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org 
> [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of anna
> Sent: Friday, 22 January 2010 12:01 p.m.
> To: r-help at r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Na.omit on matrix, does the matrix have to have 
> a limited size
> 
> 
> Hello everyone, I am using the na.omit() function on a 785 x 
> 79 matrix. When I restrict the matrix to 10 columns for 
> example it returns me the right result with the na rows 
> deleted: 756 x 10 matrix. But, if I enter the whole matrix it 
> returns me a 64 x 79 matrix, ununderstandable, I have no idea 
> why...Does anyone know what it could be? thanks
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://n4.nabble.com/Na-omit-on-matrix-does-the-matrix-have-to
> -have-a-limited-size-tp1068000p1068000.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide 
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>