[R] Anova in 'car': "SSPE apparently deficient rank"
Peter Dalgaard
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Sun Jan 3 11:32:05 CET 2010
Colleen F. Moore wrote:
> I have design with two repeated-measures factor, and no grouping
> factor. I can analyze the dataset successfully in other software,
> including my legacy DOS version BMDP, and R's 'aov' function. I would
> like to use 'Anova' in 'car' in order to obtain the sphericity tests
> and the H-F corrected p-values. I do not believe the data are truly
> deficient in rank. I followed the methods for this kind of analysis
> outlined in Bennett's excellent handouts for his Psychology 710 course http://www.psychology.mcmaster.ca/bennett/psy710/lectures/maxwell_chp12.pdf
> I am trying to convert my own similar course to R for my students
> for next fall. I have been successful at analyzing a segment of the
> data as a 2-way repeated measures design.
>
> Here is my code:
> > your.data=read.table(pipe("pbpaste"),header=T)
> > your.data
> partic A1B1 A1B2 A1B3 A1B4 A2B1 A2B2 A2B3 A2B4 A3B1 A3B2 A3B3 A3B4
> 1 p1 1 1 2 3 1 2 4 7 1 3 7 10
> 2 p2 2 2 3 3 2 2 5 6 2 4 6 9
> 3 p3 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 6 1 4 7 9
> 4 p4 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 6 2 3 8 10
> 5 p5 2 2 3 3 2 3 5 7 2 3 7 9
> > attach(your.data)
> > multmodel=lm(cbind(A1B1, A1B2, A1B3, A1B4, A2B1, A2B2, A2B3, A2B4,
> A3B1, A3B2, A3B3, A3B4)~1)
> > poke.idata=read.table(pipe("pbpaste"),header=T)
> > poke.idata
> Afac Bfac
> 1 A1 B1
> 2 A1 B2
> 3 A1 B3
> 4 A1 B4
> 5 A2 B1
> 6 A2 B2
> 7 A2 B3
> 8 A2 B4
> 9 A3 B1
> 10 A3 B2
> 11 A3 B3
> 12 A3 B4
> > attach(poke.idata)
> >
> pokeAnova
> =Anova(multmodel,idata=poke.idata,idesign=~Afac*Bfac,type="III")
> Error in linear.hypothesis.mlm(mod, hyp.matrix, SSPE = SSPE, idata =
> idata, :
> The error SSP matrix is apparently of deficient rank = 4 < 6
>
> Thanks for any help or advice. And thanks for the 'car' package, which
> is a great asset to my course. I'm just stuck on this one example.
>
Hmm, this does seem to work with regular anova.mlm:
> anova(multmodel, idata=poke.idata, X=~Afac+Bfac,test="Sph")
Analysis of Variance Table
Contrasts orthogonal to
~Afac + Bfac
Greenhouse-Geisser epsilon: 0.2880
Huynh-Feldt epsilon: 0.4871
Df F num Df den Df Pr(>F) G-G Pr H-F Pr
(Intercept) 1 36.67 6 24 6.164e-11 2.5249e-04 3.3530e-06
Residuals 4
As far as I recall, the epsilon corrections do not have a formal
requirement of a nonsingular SSD of the relevant contrast. Not sure
about the accuracy of the F probabilities in such cases, though.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-help
mailing list