[R] Using seq_len() vs 1:n

[Rolf Turner]

On 12/02/2010, at 9:39 AM, Peter Ehlers wrote:

> R-people,
> 
> Duncan Murdoch's response in
> 
>  https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2010-February/227869.html
> 
> reminded me of something I had been meaning to ask.
> 
> A while ago I started using
> 
>  for(i in seq_len(v)) {....}
> 
> in preference to
> 
>  for(i in 1:n) {....}
> 
> Duncan's post shows that if n can be zero, there is
> an advantage to using seq_len.
> Is there ever a *dis*advantage?

More key-strokes?

	cheers,

		Rolf

######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}