[R] interpreting error estimate in SEM

[John Fox]

Dear Kathryn,

I assume that MWDError is the error variance associated with MWD. If MWD is
a standardized variable (i.e., with a variance of 1) then 59% of its
variance is unaccounted for.

I hope this helps,
 John

--------------------------------
John Fox
Senator William McMaster 
  Professor of Social Statistics
Department of Sociology
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org]
On
> Behalf Of Kathryn Barto
> Sent: February-09-10 6:23 AM
> To: r-help at r-project.org
> Subject: [R] interpreting error estimate in SEM
> 
> hi,
> 
> I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the
> output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD
> error, should I say that 59% of the variation in MWD is not explained by
the
> model, or that 59% of the variation is explained, or something entirely
> different.
> 
> Parameter Estimates
>                    Estimate  Std Error z value  Pr(>|z|)
> NplantRoots         0.462029   0.120803   3.82466 1.3095e-04   plantRoots
<--
> - N
> ...
> CoError             1.000011 0.151850   6.58553 4.5325e-11 Co <--> Co
> carbonateError      1.000009 0.156217   6.40142 1.5394e-10 carbonate
<-->
> carbonate
> MWDError            0.589788   0.092128   6.40185 1.5351e-10    MWD <-->
MWD
> 
> Thanks
> Kathryn
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.