[R] Question regarding significance of a covariate in a coxme survival model
Cheng Peng
cpeng at usm.maine.edu
Sun Aug 29 15:59:44 CEST 2010
The likelihood ratio test is more reliable when one model is nested in the
other. This true for your case.
AIC/SBC are usually used when two models are in a hiearchical structure.
Please also note that any decision made
made based on AIC/SBC scores are very subjective since no sampling
distribution can be used to make a "rigorous" decision.
regarding the magnitutes between the loglikelihood and AIC/SBC, I would say
the author must used a modified version in coxme()
since several different modified AIC/SBC scores are running in practice.
My suggestion would be to use LR test for your case:
For the integrated likelihhod:
LL.small.model = - 467.3549 (including lifedxm)
LL.large.model = - 471.3333 (excluding lifedxm)
DF.diff = 3 - 1 = 2
LR: -2*(- 471.3333 + 467.3549) = 7.9568
p-value: 1-pchisq(7.9568,2) = 0.01871556
For the penalized likelihhod:
LPL.small.model = -435.2096 (including lifedxm)
LPL.large.model = -436.0478 (excluding lifedxm)
DF.diff = 3 - 1 = 2
PLR: -2*(- 436.0478 + 435.2096 ) = 1.6764
p-value: 1-pchisq(1.6764,2) = 0.4324883
Two different likehood methods produce different results, which one you
should use depends
on which likelihood makes more sense to you (or which likehood is better).
HTH
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Question-regarding-significance-of-a-covariate-in-a-coxme-survival-model-tp2313880p2399090.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the R-help
mailing list