[R] Plotting confidence bands around regression line
Frank Harrell
f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu
Wed Aug 11 18:02:03 CEST 2010
Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chairman School of Medicine
Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Michal Figurski wrote:
> Peter, Frank, David and others,
>
> Thank you all for your ideas. I understand your lack of trust in P&B
> method. Setting that aside (it's beyond me anyways), please see below
> what I have finally came up with to calculate the CI boundaries. Given
> the slope and intercept with their 05% & 95% CIs, and a range of x = 1:50 :
>
> ints = c(-1, 0, 1) # c(int05%, int, int95%)
> slos = c(0.9, 1, 1.1) # c(slo05%, slo, slo95%)
> CIs = data.frame(x=1:50, lo=NA, hi=NA)
> for (i in 1:50) {
> CIs$lo[i] = min(ints + slos * CIs$x[i])
> CIs$hi[i] = max(ints + slos * CIs$x[i])
> }
>
> It looks like it works to me. Does it make sense?
Doesn't look like it takes the correlation of slope and intercept into
account but I may not understand.
>
> Now, what about a 4-parameter 'nls' model? Do you guys think I could use
> the same approach?
This problem seems to cry out for one of the many available robust
regression methods in R.
Frank
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Michal J. Figurski, PhD
> HUP, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
> Biomarker Research Laboratory
> 3400 Spruce St. 7 Maloney
> Philadelphia, PA 19104
> tel. (215) 662-3413
>
> On 2010-08-10 13:12, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>> Michal Figurski wrote:
>>
>>> # And the result of the Passing-Bablok regression on this data frame:
>>> Estimate 5%CI 95%CI
>>> Intercept -4.306197 -9.948438 -1.374663
>>> Slope 1.257584 1.052696 1.679290
>>>
>>> The original Passing& Bablok article on this method has an easy
>>> prescription for CIs on coefficients, so I implemented that. Now I need
>>> a way to calculate CI boundaries for individual points - this may be a
>>> basic handbook stuff - I just don't know it (I'm not a statistician).
>>
>> The answer is that you can't. You can't even do it with ordinary linear
>> regression without knowing the correlation between slope and intercept.
>> However, if you can get a CI for the intercept then you could subtract
>> x0 from all the x and get a CI for the value at x0.
>>
>> (This brings echos from a distant past. My master's thesis was about
>> some similar median-type estimators. I can't remember whether I looked
>> at the Passing-Bablok paper at the time (1985!!) but my general
>> recollection is that this group of methods is littered with unstated
>> assumptions.)
>>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list