[R] Upgrading R using the "global library folder" strategy -, what do you think about it?
R P Herrold
herrold at owlriver.com
Tue Apr 27 03:45:55 CEST 2010
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Marshall Feldman wrote:
> So why not have the appropriate
> scripts ask a few questions upon the first installation of R (e.g., "Do you
> want to configure R with a "global" library for packages to make future
> upgrading easier?") and at upgrade time ("Your previous version of R has a
> "global" library; do you want the new version to use it?). I'd even go so far
> as to have the shell script automatically call an R script to run
> update.packages().
There is a large body of literature on this -- interactive
questions of non-root users are useless; root user actiuons
need to be scripted into the package management system
acessible to automation to be scaleable, and to attain the
needed administrator level permissions to make changed
> The point is that most users just want to upgrade, and the upgrade procedure
> can and should (a) make this as seamless as possible and (b) allow those who
> may want to run specialized versions of R opt out of the automatic procedure.
and computers in a environment that has to conform to a
hard specification (think: pharma research for FDA report
preparation; financial service firms) that the IT department
manages, cannot tolerate such diversity
There is no easy answer here, as 'one size cannot fit all'
-- Russ herrold
More information about the R-help
mailing list