[R] Strange question/result about SVM
Steve Lianoglou
mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com
Mon Sep 14 22:37:17 CEST 2009
> (Although I must admit that the current thread about SVMs leaves
> me --- personally --- cold. I think that SVMs are a load of dingos'
> kidneys.
So, you're saying that you find them so essential that life w/o them
is practically impossible ... unless we have dingo dialysis machines
now? Or worse .. dingo's should go extinct?
> As I may have said on this list previously, I think
> fortune("machine learning") is relevant.)
Not sure that that's entirely true, but who needs models and
assumptions when you can get your hands on some objective function to
optimize, anyway?
While not exactly relevant, I've been a big fan of this Vapnik photo ...
http://aboutintelligence.blogspot.com/2009/01/vapniks-picture-explained.html
My $.2 worth of levity,
-steve
ps - You can put a smiley at the end of each sentence, but then it
just seems to look like line noise ... infer them as you see fit ...
--
Steve Lianoglou
Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
| Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
| Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact
More information about the R-help
mailing list