[R] post-hoc test with kruskal.test()
Meyners, Michael, LAUSANNE, AppliedMathematics
Michael.Meyners at rdls.nestle.com
Wed Oct 14 10:29:50 CEST 2009
Robert,
you can do the corresponding paired comparisons using wilcox.test. As far as I know, there is no such general correction as Tukey's HSD for the Kruskal-Wallis-Test. However, if you have indeed only 3 groups (resulting in 3 paired comparisons), the intersection-union principle and the theory of closed test procedures should allow you to do these test without further correction, given the global test was statistically significant.
HTH, Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org
> [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Robert Kalicki
> Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2009 09:17
> To: r-help at r-project.org
> Subject: [R] post-hoc test with kruskal.test()
>
> Dear R users,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a
> post-hoc test (factor levels comparison, like Tukey for
> ANOVA) of a non-parametric analysis of variance with
> kruskal.test() function. I am comparing three different
> groups. The preliminary analysis using the
> kruskal-wallis-test show significance, but I still don't know
> the relationship and the significance level between each group?
>
>
>
> Do you have any suggestion?
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________
> Robert M. Kalicki, MD
>
> Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Nephrology and Hypertension
>
> Inselspital
>
> University of Bern
>
> Switzerland
>
>
>
> Address:
>
> Klinik und Poliklinik für Nephrologie und Hypertonie
>
> KiKl G6
>
> Freiburgstrasse 15
>
> CH-3010 Inselspital Bern
>
>
>
> Tel +41(0)31 632 96 63
>
> Fax +41(0)31 632 14 58
>
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list