[R] Looking for a better way to document my packages
baptiste auguie
baptiste.auguie at googlemail.com
Thu Oct 1 19:12:51 CEST 2009
Hi,
I know of three options that resemble your query,
- the roxygen package
- a ruby script called weeder by Hadley Wikham
- the inlinedocs package on r-forge
I only ever used roxygen though, so i can't speak for the relative
merits of the others.
HTH,
baptiste
2009/10/1 Steve Lianoglou <mailinglist.honeypot at gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to do what my subject says.
>
> As I'm trying to be better about making packages out of my code, I'd like
> the packages themselves to be better, which means *.Rd-documenting my code.
> The thing is, from years of programming other languages prior to landing in
> the R pond, I've grown accustomed to documenting my functions inline. I'm
> not just used to it, but I like it more than having function documentation
> completely removed from my function, code.
>
> So, for example
>
> myNeatFunction <- function(arg1, arg2, arg3=NULL, ...) {
> # One liner describing the neat thing this function does.
> #
> # More comments, probably very much what would be in the
> # \description section of the *Rd
> #
> # Parameters
> # ----------
> # arg1 : <some comments>
> # arg2 : <some comments>
> # ... This is essentially the same exact stuff that would
> # be in the \arguments{} section of the *.Rd
> #
> # Returns
> # -------
> # A description of what's returned, let's say this is
> # what you'd find in the \value{} section.
> #
> # Notes
> # -----
> # Maybe something like the \details{} section, though this
> # might as well be up in the description section, too.
> # etc.
> }
>
> There's essentially a 1-to-1 mapping of the comments I write here and what I
> would write in an *.Rd file, but I'd rather have it written in my function
> definition than an external document.
>
> Are there any tools that help facilitate this? Or are there better ways you
> folks have figured out to do something similar?
>
> I don't need the function comment block to be exactly what I showed here,
> but it's just an example of how I'm currently writing my stuff. I'm thinking
> something like sphinx (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) from the python world would
> be cool. Perhaps there's a way to make a plugin for that to parse R-code.
> That's more work than I want to bit off right now, but if there isn't
> something useful in R-land already, it might be a fun side project.
>
> Just curious,
> -steve
>
> --
> Steve Lianoglou
> Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology
> | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
> | Weill Medical College of Cornell University
> Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list