[R] Condition to factor (easy to remember)
dieter.menne at menne-biomed.de
Thu Oct 1 13:47:56 CEST 2009
Douglas Bates-2 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Douglas Bates <bates at stat.wisc.edu>
> And besides, Frank Harrell will soon be weighing in to tell you why
> you shouldn't dichotomize in the first place.
Subjects in this study received a 20 ml infusion of Kirsch (40%, Swiss
Brand) at t=10 minutes, therefore the second interval should read "Prost"
instead of "Post". Even Frank would admit this is a valid dichotomization.
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Condition-to-factor-%28easy-to-remember%29-tp25676411p25696647.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the R-help