[R] Calculating the percentage of explained deviance in lmer

[willow1980]

Hi, Fabio,
I only have an idea on how to calculate deviance explained by the fixed
effects. If you remove fixed effects and introduce one null model such as
m2<-lmer(response-var ~ 1+(1|Site/Area/Transect),family="binomial"). Then,
(deviance(m2)-deviance(m1))/deviance(m2) will represent deviance explained
by fixed effects in m1. Hope this makes some sense.
Best regards,
Jianghua


Fabio Bulleri wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> I am trying to calculate some measure of the amount of variability in the
> response variable that is explained by a model fitted in lmer 
> m1<-lmer(response-var ~
> Condition+(1|Site/Area/Transect),family="binomial") . 
> I've seen from the literature that the precentage of explained deviance is
> a common measure. How can I calculate it?
> Thanks a lot for your help, I hope this is not too shallow.
> Best
> Fabio
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fabio Bulleri, PhD
> Dipartimento di Biologia
> Università di Pisa
> Via A. Volta 6, I-56126, Pisa, Italy
> Tel. +39 050 2211448
> Fax +39 050 2211410
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Calculating-the-percentage-of-explained-deviance-in-lmer-tp26286427p26456408.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.