[R] Unnecesary code?
Hun S. Tesatte
hunsyntesat at hush.com
Thu Nov 19 10:23:18 CET 2009
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:13:27 +0100 Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch at stats.uwo.ca> wrote:
>hunsyntesat at hush.com wrote:
>> Dear R-ers,
>>
>> While browsing the R sources, I found the following piece of
>code
>> in src\main\memory.c:
>>
>> static void reset_pp_stack(void *data)
>> {
>> R_size_t *poldpps = data;
>> R_PPStackSize = *poldpps;
>> }
>>
>> To me, it looks like the poldpps pointer is a nuissance; can't
>you
>> just cast the data pointer and derefer it at once? Say,
>>
>> static void reset_pp_stack(void *data)
>> {
>> R_PPStackSize = * (R_size_t *) data;
>> }
>>
>What would you gain by this change?
>
>Duncan Murdoch
Seriously? What would you gain by rejecting the change?
I think the gain is obvious, even if not essential: the code is
cleaner. If there is a choice between two different pieces of code
that have the same effect, choosing the simpler makes it easier to
maintain the code, and easier for a casual user to understand
what's going on. Anyone looking at the original code for the first
time will have to realise that poldpps is a nuissance variable with
no practical importance and no gain whatsoever, the change cuts
this need.
There is also a negligible loss in performance when the inessential
stack variable is allocated.
-- Hun
More information about the R-help
mailing list