[R] If...while...or what else??
Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendieck at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 16:28:27 CET 2009
If efficiency is not of concern then this is easy to understand:
for(i in 1:5) for(j in 1:5) if (i < j) { ... }
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Niccolò Bassani
<biostatistica at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear R users,I come to you with a quite silly question I think, but I hope
> you can answer me...
> That is, I've got some problems in using the if and while conditions in a
> loop.
> Substantially, I want to select rows in a dataset depending on an index
> variable (suppose it ranges from 1 to 5), so to make a specific analysis
> (homemade of course) on thie new dataset. Mi first tought has been to do a
> double loop like this:
>
> for i in 1:5{
> for j in (i+1):5{
> data = dataset[(variable==i) | (variable==j),]
> ##analysis
> ##analysis
> }
> }
>
> This way I should select all the couples only once (gaining in efficiency I
> hope). The fact is that this arrangement has a problem: that j ends up with
> ranging from 2 to 6, not from to 2 to 5. So when I do a subsetting on the
> dataset to obtain only the rows corresponding to the values of i and j I
> want, when the loop comes to j = 6 I have an error, of course.
> What I want to know is: how can I use the if or while condition in such a
> loop to avoid the routine doing the computations for this case? I.e., can I
> tell somehow R "Hey, if j=6, let it go and move on with the other
> computations"?
> Or maybe you can see a faster and better way of using the for conditions??
>
> I hope I made myself clear, if not I'll carify myself!!
>
> Thanks in advance
> Niccolò
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
More information about the R-help
mailing list