[R] R in the NY Times

Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendieck at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 04:00:14 CET 2009


Note that the mts object I posted already had Jan 2009 removed and also
had the NA rows removed.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You might want to remove the 2009 data from each of the three lists
>> given that the January data is not yet complete.
>>
>> The result of including the January 2009 data in your plots is that the
>> growth trajectory for the smoothed curves for SAS-L and R-Help appear to
>> be leveling or even declining, when at least for R-Help, that is not the
>> case. The S-News curve is not affected significantly, given the already
>> declining counts.
>>
>> The effect of the 2009 data is most noticeable in the log scale plot.
>>
>> Thus:
>>
>> all <- subset(all, year < 2009)
>
> Good point - thanks for the fix!
>
> Hadley
>
> --
> http://had.co.nz/
>




More information about the R-help mailing list