[R] Problems in Recommending R

[Patrick Burns]

Ajay ohri wrote:
> How much time do you think is needed to read 133 pages of FAQ.
>   

About 132.5 / 133 more times longer than most
people are wanting to spend.

Patrick Burns
patrick at burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of "The R Inferno" and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")
> Regards,
>
> Ajay
>
> www.decisionstats.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
>   
>> wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>> Hadley wickham wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> The most useful thing (and quite rightly so) on the front page is the link
>>>       
>>>> the the FAQ which should be the starting point for anyone looking at any
>>>> new
>>>> software, and answers/explains everything thats pertinent!  (At least
>>>> thats
>>>> what I read first when I start using new software and have questions).
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Again, have you ever read the FAQ?  It is 133 pages!
>>>
>>>       
>> This means you have not read them??? Time to start reading!
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Hadley
>>     
>>>       
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>>     
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
>