[R] Is SEM package of R suitable for sem analysis

[Joe King]

Your welcome, I wanted to say I agree with Bruno that the comparative
software is very expensive, even more prohibitively so for students and even
though MPlus is good I think R will catch up rapidly and even overtake those
as people who use these modeling techniques become more integrated into the
R community.

Joe King
206-913-2912
jp at joepking.com
"Never throughout history has a man who lived a life of ease left a name
worth remembering." --Theodore Roosevelt


-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Reeyarn_???_10928113
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 6:27 PM
To: R-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Is SEM package of R suitable for sem analysis

Dear Bruno and Joe,

Thanks for advising!


Reeyarn

On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Bruno Falissard <falissard_b at wanadoo.fr>
wrote:

> A few years ago it could have been true, but now the package has improved
> (especially with the bootstrap procedure).
> At the moment there is no argument to recommend AMOS.

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Joe King <jp at joepking.com> wrote:

> I am going to take SEM this next quarter in my doctoral program. My
> suggestion is to use the program your professor suggests and try to
> re-create your models in R using the SEM package.

______________________________________________
R-help at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.