[R] Newbie: colSums() compared with Matlab's sum()

[Benilton Carvalho]

replace data[1:i,] by data[1:i,drop=FALSE].

b

On Dec 24, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Francesco Napolitano wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm trying to learn R after years of Matlab's experience. Here is an
> issue I couldn't solve today.
> 
> Consider the following piece of code (written by memory):
> 
> for(i in 1:n){
>    submat <- data[1:i,]
>    C <- colSums(submat)
>    }
> 
> The problem is that at the first iteration, data[1:1,] reduces to a
> vector and colSums returns an error. This sounds really strange to me
> because a sum-over-columns operation should have no problem working with
> columns of length 1. Matlab's "sum()" works just fine in such case.
> 
> The error says that I need an at least 2D array. So I try using
> matrix(data[1:i,]). Unfortunately this returns a column instead of a
> row. So I could do t(matrix(data[1:i,])), but this would transpose the
> also the sub-matrices from the 2nd iteration on. I could fix everything
> with some "if" but it would be really terrible code :-/.
> 
> I'm sure I'm missing something because my neurons stick with Matlab
> behaviour. Can you help me to understand what's wrong with my reasoning?
> 
> Thank you very much,
> Francesco.
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.