[R] Bug in "is" ?

[Rolf Turner]

On 26/09/2008, at 9:23 AM, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:

> indeed.  one more example that R man pages are often rather
> uninformative, despite verbosity.

	My, you ***are*** in a bad mood, aren't you? :-)

	The quality of R documentation has been debated, castigated
	defended and dissected many times before on this list.

	Overall the quality of the documentation is good.  It is a
	bit ``curate's egg'', but overall ... it's good.  Especially
	in comparison with most other systems.

	There are parts of the documentation that I'd like to re-write.
	But they would never let me! :-)

		cheers,

			Rolf

######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}