[R] Difference in p-values between R and SPSS
Thomas Lumley
tlumley at u.washington.edu
Thu Sep 11 22:07:34 CEST 2008
That is a larger difference in p-values than I would expect due to
numerical differences and stopping criteria. My guess is that you are
running across the different approximations for tied failure times. If
so, you will get better agreement with SPSS by using method="breslow" in
coxph().
-thomas
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Kåre Edvardsen wrote:
> My apologies for asking slightly about SPSS in addition to R...
>
> Could not find an exact answer in the archives on whether R and SPSS may
> give different p-vals when output for coeffs and conf-intervals are the
> same.
> Amyway, a colleague and I are doing a very simple coxreg analyses and
> get the same results for the coefficient and confidence interval,
>
> exp(coef) exp(-coef) lower .95 upper .95
> age_at_entry 1.02 0.98 1.01 1.03
>
>
> but in R we get p = 0.00011, and SPSS gives p < 0.0001
>
> Should we worry about this difference in p-value or do R and SPSS
> sometime differ?
>
> All the best,
> Kare
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu University of Washington, Seattle
More information about the R-help
mailing list